Do You Know What Your AI Agents Are Exposing?

Vendor-agnostic assessment for AI agents, covering technical risk, governance controls, and framework alignment across OWASP, NIST, CSA, and EU AI Act.

Vendor-Agnostic Assessment OWASP, NIST, CSA, and EU AI Act Human-Validated AI Outputs

Frameworks We Assess Against

Four Frameworks, One Assessment

AI agents create technical, governance, cloud control, and regulatory obligations at the same time. We assess the overlap once, then show where one issue affects multiple frameworks.

OWASP OWASP Agentic Top 10

Technical attack paths in agentic systems, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity abuse, memory poisoning, supply chain risk, and cascading failures.

NIST NIST COSAiS

Governance, control structure, and identity expectations for organizations that need defensible oversight, especially in regulated or federal-facing environments.

CSA CSA AI Controls Matrix

Cloud control expectations for model security, agent access restriction, data protection, human supervision, and control ownership in hosted AI systems.

EU AI Act EU AI Act (Articles 9 through 15) Deadline: Aug 2026

Regulatory obligations for high-risk AI systems, including risk management, documentation, logging, transparency, human oversight, and cybersecurity requirements.

What You Receive

One Engagement, Three Deliverables

Outputs designed for leadership, GRC, security, and engineering teams that all need different levels of detail from the same review.

Findings by Framework

See where your deployment creates exposure across each selected framework. One review maps to the obligations that matter, so teams can understand overlap without commissioning separate audits.

Secure Evidence Package

We organize policies, configurations, inventories, logs, and governance records in a format your team can use during audit preparation, internal review, and remediation planning.

Action Plan and Scorecard

Leadership gets a concise executive readout. Security and engineering teams get a remediation backlog and scorecard tied to clear next steps, ownership, and priority.

How It Works

From Scoping to Findings Delivery

A structured review for teams with AI agents already in motion and teams preparing to launch them.

01

Discovery and Scoping

Stakeholder sessions with security, GRC, engineering, and AI teams to inventory current or planned agents, define scope, and identify which frameworks apply.

02

Multi-Framework Assessment

Questionnaire review, architecture analysis, evidence collection, and control mapping across in-scope frameworks. We identify where one design choice creates both technical and compliance exposure.

03

Findings and Delivery

Your team leaves with a clear executive readout, a remediation backlog, and framework-specific findings that show what to fix first and why it matters.

04

Optional Enterprise Reassessment

Enterprise Tier

For enterprise programs with ongoing governance needs, we can revisit the assessment as agents, controls, and regulatory expectations evolve.

Why Avinteli

Built for Agent Risk, Not Generic AI Policy Review

Vendor-Agnostic by Design

Recommendations are tied to your controls, workflows, and architecture, not to a preferred cloud, model vendor, or framework bias.

Security and Compliance in One Review

The same engagement gives CISOs, GRC leaders, security teams, and engineers a shared findings set instead of disconnected technical and compliance workstreams.

Agent-Specific Threat Coverage

We review identity delegation, tool permissions, prompt injection paths, memory handling, trust boundaries, and MCP exposure, not just generic AI governance language.

Actionable Outputs for Engineering

Deliverables are designed to move into planning, tracking, and remediation, so the assessment produces action instead of becoming a static report.

Engagement Options

Choose the Scope That Fits Your Compliance Needs

Select the engagement that matches your current regulatory exposure. Expand coverage as your AI program matures.

Focused Assessment

Single-framework coverage for teams validating one immediate obligation or establishing a technical baseline.

  • Assessment against one framework, typically OWASP or NIST
  • Multi-domain compliance questionnaire
  • Executive PDF with findings summary
  • Technical remediation backlog
  • Compliance scorecard with maturity ratings
Recommended

Dual-Framework Assessment

Multi-framework coverage for organizations with regulatory obligations, cloud governance needs, or EU AI Act exposure.

  • Assessment against two frameworks, including common pairings such as EU AI Act plus OWASP
  • All Focused Assessment deliverables
  • Cross-framework control mapping
  • Consolidated compliance scorecard

Enterprise Assessment

Full framework coverage for regulated enterprises that need broader oversight, repeatable evidence handling, and optional ongoing reassessment.

  • Everything in the Focused and Dual-Framework Assessments
  • Regulatory evidence package for audit readiness
  • Optional ongoing reassessment for enterprise governance programs
  • Priority scheduling as frameworks and program scope evolve

If AI Agents Are in Scope, Your Security Review Should Be Too.

Book a free consultation. We will walk through your current or planned AI agent landscape, identify which frameworks apply, and define a practical assessment scope.